The evidence
In controlled experiments, speech rate, intonation, and pitch affected perceived confidence and persuasion. Across roughly 3,000 hours of Supreme Court argument, the voice carried signal beyond the words alone.
Upload your matter · one jurist · one live round100+ judges · AI fine-tuned on public work · recreated voices
Don't hear the hardest question for the first time at the lectern.
Upload the record you are preparing — the briefs, the decisions below, the passages you will be pressed on. Choose from more than 100 judges. Each AI jurist model is fine-tuned on that judge's public decisions, opinions, and speeches; each voice is recreated from public recordings. Hear that judge's question in their own voice, then answer aloud through every follow-up.
100+ judges · AI models fine-tuned on their public work · one judge per live round
Source-bound example: Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, [2023] UKSC 4 Prepared
Hypothetical bench · none of these jurists sat in Fearn · the simulated questions are not quotations or endorsements.
- Clarence Thomas
- Beverley McLachlin
- Lady Hale
- D. Y. Chandrachud
- More than 100 judges available to choose from
Thomas · McLachlin · Hale · Chandrachud
Prerecorded sample · four of 100+ judges
From the bench · CLARENCE THOMAS
“Hundreds of thousands use this purpose-built platform each year, and a significant number closely observe the flats. What common-law principle requires treating that as mere overlooking rather than a possible nuisance?”
Press play to hear each juristThat was the sample: four questions from four of more than 100 judges. In a live round, one judge stays on your answer.
Request an invitationThe Fearn matter, prepared for a round.
The matter
Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery
Drawn only from the High Court and Court of Appeal judgments below the UK Supreme Court.
Read the case ↗The sample — four perspectives
Clarence Thomas · United States
Scale and common-law principle
Beverley McLachlin · Canada
Line drawing and administrability
Lady Hale · United Kingdom
Ordinary home life, mitigation, and good-neighbourliness
D. Y. Chandrachud · India
Photography, digital dissemination, and attribution
Choose from more than 100 judges. Their AI models are fine-tuned on public decisions, opinions, and speeches, and their voices are recreated from public recordings. One judge sits per live round.
Tell us where to follow up about access.
Your matter. One jurist. One live round.
- 01
Upload the matter
The briefs, decisions, and record extracts you actually rely on.
- 02
Choose who sits
Choose from more than 100 judges, each with an AI model fine-tuned on their public work and a voice recreated from public recordings.
- 03
Argue it out
Answer every follow-up aloud. Leave with the transcript, cited to the uploaded passages that grounded the round.
You cannot rehearse an interruption in a text box.
The weak answer appears when you have to say it. Greenroom Legal listens to the answer you actually give and asks the next question from there.